The author uses words with negative meanings such as; dark, abandoned, and destroyed to set the tone of the article. They do not want the reader to miss the gloom of this particular rundown park. There is a scarcity positive words used in this article; except for perhaps the town joke that Jesus was electrocuted on the massive park's cross. Even then, something sinister still lingers. Diction is also used to emphasize the park's failed intentions. The writer explains how "Greco had hopes of expanding the site to attract more visitors..." but had died before any progress was made. In the next paragraph, the writer describes the helpless efforts of nuns to revive the "Holy Land" but, the park only "attracted vandals". The writer's decision to use the word "attract" in both cases is a method of distinguishing the difference between the early years of 'Holy Land" and the present.
The "Abandoned Holy Land" is painted clearly for the reader through the physical description and adjectives. To give an idea of the property's current state, although owned by nuns, the writer states "local teenagers and foragers who have made their mark". My favorite description of the park were the "beheaded" statues, "destroyed" dioramas and "blocked" tunnels. It sounded as though the "Holy Land" had been pillaged by a band of thieves from a rivaling town. An example of an adjective used that candidly described the park, was "seedy". This word allowed me to grasp the sagging and worn appearance of the abandoned lot.
The article's melancholy tone is made though diction and imagery, while accentuating the contradiction of a spiritual place being a symbol of demise. Just the idea of a man named John Baptist creating a biblical theme park, is fascinating alone. However, the glorious past of 'Holy Land' is only a memory. This article focuses on how this intended heaven-on-earth is now notorious for vandalism, danger, and even murder. The author's diction emphasized this by using words that evoked darkness, and connecting them with words like "nun" or "haven". The imagery provided in this article makes the point that 'Holy Land U.S.A" has lost it's intended meaning since the founder's death. This makes the reader not only sympathize with Greco but, realize the disturbing message this site projects- that a place like the "Holy Land" can't exist in our society.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/atlas_obscura/2013/08/22/once_popular_with_pilgrims_the_holy_land_usa_religious_theme_park_is_now.html?wpisrc=obnetwork
http://www.slate.com/blogs/atlas_obscura/2013/08/22/once_popular_with_pilgrims_the_holy_land_usa_religious_theme_park_is_now.html?wpisrc=obnetwork
Audrey,
ReplyDeleteYour structure and attention to detail is great. I am not sure that you have to structure your post like an essay, but there is still nothing wrong about it. Your claims are effectively supported with evidence, and you make sure that every paragraph builds on your point. You also write about the point that the author is trying to get across to his audience and use your earlier claims to support this. I would have like it if you used one more DIDLS. Language, perhaps?
You also mention how the article change your initial opinion. Perhaps you can write how certain aspects achieved this. Why did the dark diction make you view the park as more of a tragedy? What was compelling about the "seedy" area that made it more pathetic than intimidating?
Auds,
ReplyDeleteVery eerie indeed. I felt as if a cloud of gray hung over my shoulder as I read through this article. Even you, my dear, established a medieval-like doom in your own writing to support your claims. While reading this article I too was struck by the at times significant use of imagery and diction. Honestly, I felt like the author could have used more imagery. For example, when Obscura writes: "Statues have been beheaded, dioramas destroyed, and tunnels blocked," obviously I'm capable of dreaming up the destruction, but it would have been nice to see the jagged ruins worn with the lines of the passing years...ya know? sorry, my mind wishes for too much. But, your evidence and analysis, I think, are spot on. You recognize the authors techniques and you provide examples from the article to back your claims as you expand on them. I also liked his use of the word, "seedy". You know there's darkness when an author uses "seedy" as a word choice. Seedy.
Audrey,
ReplyDeleteyou do a great job of explaining detail, providing examples with the evidence and analysis. which you do a amazing job on supporting your claims and points and really expanding them. i really liked that you added a lot of personal thoughts of what the author wrote. like how you said that "My favorite description of the park were the "beheaded" statues, "destroyed" dioramas and "blocked" tunnels. It sounded as though the "Holy Land" had been pillaged by a band of thieves from a rivaling town." i also liked how the author mentioned 'seedy' hmm which i agree with Matthew, why do you think the author used that word?
Audrey--Matthew is right when he advises that you need another DIDLS technique here, and you really should have revised for this....
ReplyDelete